Problem Solving requires problem understanding and problem exploration. We have seen there is general tendency to get into solving - getting to solutions quickly before even understanding the problem.
We describe 4 Types of Problems that we encountered usually in our workshops. Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) describe these as contradictions - some sort of conflicts between various system parameters.
Type A: Wish/Aspiration ~ Administrative Contradiction ~ May be High level Objective setting (Almost ~ Do "Something")
Type B: Unexpected Results/Consequences of an action
Type C: Beyond Optimisation (Technical Contradiction)
Type D: Paradox (physical contradiction)
-----------------------------------------------------
We describe below the basic anatomy of these 4 type of problems and what questions can help you refine these problem statements towards a solution thinking.
This is part of our SOUL-ALVIS-CRAFT framework
Type A: Wish/Aspiration ~ Administrative Contradiction ~ May be High level Objective setting (Almost ~ Do "Something")
Anatomy of Type A problems : (1) We should do X (increase productivity, profit, reliability, etc, decrease attrition, waste, etc)) (2) I want to do X, but have no opportunity or not allowed to do X. (3) We should do X, but do not know how/vague idea of how to do
Question on the problem statement : Why should you do X? What is stopping you to do X?
------------------------------------------------------
Type B: Unexpected Results/Consequences of an action
Anatomy of Type B problems : (1) We did Y expecting X, but it resulted in Z? (2) We did Y to do X, we achieved X partially but we also had Z which is harmful/not expected/not thought through?
Question on the problem statement : Why were you expecting X (X only)? What was missed out when you conceived Y to achieve X? Why Z was not expected? Could something done while doing Y caused Z? Can Y be modified to eliminate that something?
--------------------------------------------------------
Type C: Beyond Optimisation
Anatomy of Type C problems : (1) We improve X by doing Y but it worsen/reduce Z which is not desired. (2) We improve X by doing Y but we can not do more Y to improve X as it reduces/worsens Z, so we do Y only to an extent to optimise X and Z.
Question on the problem statement : Could something done while doing Y caused Z to worsen? What is that? Can Y be modified to eliminate that something? Can we find Y-Dash which does X AND doesn’t worsen Z?
---------------------------------------------------------
Type D: Paradox (physical contradiction)
Anatomy of Type D problems : (1) We want X to have P AND we want X to have "Not P". (2) We want X to function as Y AND we want X to function as NOT Y
Question on the problem statement : When do you want P and when not P? Where do you want P and where not P? Under what conditions you want P and under what conditions you want not P?
*****
We describe 4 Types of Problems that we encountered usually in our workshops. Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) describe these as contradictions - some sort of conflicts between various system parameters.
Type A: Wish/Aspiration ~ Administrative Contradiction ~ May be High level Objective setting (Almost ~ Do "Something")
Type B: Unexpected Results/Consequences of an action
Type C: Beyond Optimisation (Technical Contradiction)
Type D: Paradox (physical contradiction)
-----------------------------------------------------
We describe below the basic anatomy of these 4 type of problems and what questions can help you refine these problem statements towards a solution thinking.
This is part of our SOUL-ALVIS-CRAFT framework
Type A: Wish/Aspiration ~ Administrative Contradiction ~ May be High level Objective setting (Almost ~ Do "Something")
Anatomy of Type A problems : (1) We should do X (increase productivity, profit, reliability, etc, decrease attrition, waste, etc)) (2) I want to do X, but have no opportunity or not allowed to do X. (3) We should do X, but do not know how/vague idea of how to do
Question on the problem statement : Why should you do X? What is stopping you to do X?
------------------------------------------------------
Type B: Unexpected Results/Consequences of an action
Anatomy of Type B problems : (1) We did Y expecting X, but it resulted in Z? (2) We did Y to do X, we achieved X partially but we also had Z which is harmful/not expected/not thought through?
Question on the problem statement : Why were you expecting X (X only)? What was missed out when you conceived Y to achieve X? Why Z was not expected? Could something done while doing Y caused Z? Can Y be modified to eliminate that something?
--------------------------------------------------------
Type C: Beyond Optimisation
Anatomy of Type C problems : (1) We improve X by doing Y but it worsen/reduce Z which is not desired. (2) We improve X by doing Y but we can not do more Y to improve X as it reduces/worsens Z, so we do Y only to an extent to optimise X and Z.
Question on the problem statement : Could something done while doing Y caused Z to worsen? What is that? Can Y be modified to eliminate that something? Can we find Y-Dash which does X AND doesn’t worsen Z?
---------------------------------------------------------
Type D: Paradox (physical contradiction)
Anatomy of Type D problems : (1) We want X to have P AND we want X to have "Not P". (2) We want X to function as Y AND we want X to function as NOT Y
Question on the problem statement : When do you want P and when not P? Where do you want P and where not P? Under what conditions you want P and under what conditions you want not P?
*****
