FIND InnoNuggets

 

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Bibliography

Some references of papers and books (there may be some repetitions)

  • Makajic-Nikolic D., et all, Bullwhip Effect and supply chain Modelling and Analysis Using CPN Tools, www.daimi.au.dk/CPnets/workshop04/cpn/papers/makajic-nikolic_panic_vujosevic.pdf (accessed 02 Oct 2006)
  • Chavez T and Dion G.R., Using Decision Engineering to Achieve Short Predictable Lead Time at Sun Microsystems, Inc., Cycle Time Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1998.
  • Hoch S.J., Kunreuther H.C. and Gunther R.E. (Eds), Wharton on Making Decisions, John Wiley & Sons, USA, 2006
  • Bhushan N, Robust Inventive Software Design – A Framework Combining DSM, AHP and TRIZ, 7th DSM conference, Seattle, 2005
  • Saaty T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw Hill, NY, 1980
  • Jaiswal N.K., Military Operations Research – Quantitative Decision Making, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997
  • Bhushan N. and Rai K., Strategic Decision Making – Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Springer, 2004
  • Senge P.M., The Fifth Discipline, Random House, UK, 1990
  • Trivedi K.S., Probability & Statistics with Reliability, Queuing and Computer Science Applications, Prentice Hall, US,1982.
  • Forrester Jay. Industrial Dynamics. Pegasus Communications: Waltham, MA, 1961
  • Miller G.A., The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information, The Psychological Review,, vol. 63, 1956
  • http://www.niedermayer.ca/papers/bayesian/ (accessed 02 Oct 2006)
  • Thomas L. Friedman, The World is Flat, Penguin Books, 2005
  • Bhushan N, Robust Inventive Software Design – A Framework Combining DSM, AHP and TRIZ, 7th DSM conference, Boeing, Seattle, 2005
  • Kugler S., Set-based concurrent engineering in Open Source Software Development, www.vizzzion.org/stuff/thesis-final.pdf (accessed 02 October 2006)
  • Dahan E., Reducing Technical Uncertainty in Product and Process Development through Parallel Design of Prototypes, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 1998
  • Wu S., A Probabilistic Model of Set-Based Design, MIT Undergraduate Journal of Mathematics
  • Bhushan, N., Decision Dependency Matrices, 8th DSM Conference, Boeing, Seattle, 2006
  • Pardes C. el al, Set-Based Design: A Decision-Theoretic Perspective, http://www.pslm.gatech.edu/events/frontiers2006/proceedings/2006-03-16-Frontiers2006-Paredis.pdf#search=%22Set-Based%20Design%3AA%20Decision-Theoretic%20Perspective%22Paredis.pdf#search=%22Set-Based%20Design%3AA%20Decision-Theoretic%20Perspective%22 (accessed on 02 Oct 2006)
  • Rekuc, S.J., J.M. Aughenbaugh, M. Bruns, and C.J.J. Paredis, 2006, Eliminating Design Alternatives Based on Imprecise Information, Society of Automotive Engineering World Congress, paper no. 2006-01-0272, April 3-6, 2006, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Sobek D.K. et al., Toyota’s principles of set-based concurrent engineering, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 40, winter 1999.
  • Ballard C., Positive Vs Negative Iteration in Design, Lean Construction Institution
  • Putnam L.H., and Myers W., Five Core Metrics – The Intelligence Behind Successful Project, Dorset House Publishing, NY, 2003.
  • Brooks F.P., The Mythical Man-Month - Essays on Software Engineering, Addison Wesley, 1995.
  • Bhushan N. and Kaushik V., Software Entropy – Definition and Applications, Workshop series on Empirical Software Engineering, (Ed.) Bunse C. and Jedlitschka A., Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, 2003, ISBN 381676374X.
  • Industry Outlook 2004, Business Week, 12 Jan 2004.
  • Groth R., Is the Software Industry’s Productivity Declining? IEEE Software, Nov/Dec 2004.
  • Scacchi W., Understanding Software Productivity, Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, D. Hurley (ed.), Volume 4, pp37-70, 1995
  • Verner J.M. and Evanco W.M., In-House Software Development: What Project Management Practices Lead to Success, IEEE Software, Jan/Feb 2005.
  • Darcy D.P. et al, The Structural Complexity of Software: Testing the interaction of Coupling and Cohesion, http://littlehurt.gsia.cmu.edu/gsiadoc/WP/2005-E23.pdf, accessed on 15th March 2005.
  • Lew K.S., Dillon T.S. and Forward K.E., Software Complexity and its impact of Software Reliability, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol 14., No. 11, November 1998.
  • Tran-Cao D., Abran A. and Levesque G., Functional Complexity Measurement, Proceedings of International Workshop on Software Measurement, August 28-29, 2001.
  • Bhushan N., Balancing Reliability and Software Complexity – Can TRIZ help? International Conference on Quality, Reliability and Information Technology (ICQRIT), December 2003.
    •http://http://www.sei.cmu.edu/
  • Fairley, R., Software Engineering Concepts, McGraw Hill, 1985
  • Shooman, M.L., Software Engineering, McGraw Hill, 1983.
  • Patel S., Chu W., and Baxter R., A Measure of Composite Module Cohesion, ACM conference, 1992.
    http://www.sei.cmu.edu/str/descriptions/mitmpm.html
  • Bonacich, P.B., Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures, American Journal of Sociology 92, 1170-1182, 1987
  • Bhushan, N. and Rai, K., Strategic Decision Making – Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Springer UK, 2004.
  • Bhushan, N., Robust Inventive Software Design (RISD) – A Framework Combining DSM, TRIZ and AHP, 7th International Conference on Dependency Structure Matrix, Seattle, US, October 2005, http://www.dsmweb.org/workshops/DSM2005/dsm05conf/presentations/day_3/01_Day3_Navneet_Bhushan.pdf (accessed on July 4, 2006)
  • Businessweek Research Services, Global Product Development – Moving from Strategy to Execution, 2006. (Can be downloaded from http://www.ptc.com/)
  • Ballard C., Positive Vs Negative Iteration in Design, Lean Construction Institution
  • Bhushan N. and Karthik L., Strategic Project Management Priorities in Global Software Development Scenarios, Communicated to IEEE Software, 2007.
  • Bhushan N., System Complexity Estimator Applications in Software Architecture, Design and Project Planning, 3rd International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Infocom Technology, ICQRIT, 2-4 Dec 2006, New Delhi, India.
  • Bhushan N., Decision Dependency Matrices, 8th International DSM Conference, Seattle, US, Oct 2006
  • Bhushan N., Set Based Concurrent Engineering Using DSM – A Framework for Software Development, 8th International DSM Conference, Seattle, US, Oct 2006.
  • Bhushan N., Robust Inventive Software Design (RISD) – A Framework Combining DSM, AHP and TRIZ, 7th International DSM Conference, Seattle, US, Oct 2005
  • Bhushan N. and Rai K., Strategic Decision Making – Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Springer, 2004
  • Chavez T and Dion G.R., Using Decision Engineering to Achieve Short Predictable Lead Time at Sun Microsystems, Inc., Cycle Time Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1998.
  • Dahan E., Reducing Technical Uncertainty in Product and Process Development through Parallel Design of Prototypes, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 1998
  • Eppinger S.D. and Tripathy A., DSM Models of Globally Distributed Product Development Structures, 8th International DSM Conference, Seattle, US, Oct 2006.
  • Forrester Jay. Industrial Dynamics, Pegasus Communications: Waltham, MA, 1961
  • Hoch S.J., Kunreuther H.C. and Gunther R.E. (Eds), Wharton on Making Decisions, John Wiley & Sons, USA, 2006
  • Kugler S., Set-based concurrent engineering in Open Source Software Development, www.vizzzion.org/stuff/thesis-final.pdf (accessed 02 October 2006)
  • Larry H. and Sakkab N., Connect and Develop Inside Proctor and Gamble’s New Model of Innovation, Harvard Business Review, March 2006.
  • Makajic-Nikolic D., et all, Bullwhip Effect and supply chain Modelling and Analysis Using CPN Tools, http://www.daimi.au.dk/CPnets/workshop04/cpn/papers/makajic-nikolic_panic_vujosevic.pdfnikolic_panic_vujosevic.pdf (accessed 02 Oct 2006)
  • Pardes C. el al, Set-Based Design: A Decision-Theoretic Perspective, http://www.pslm.gatech.edu/events/frontiers2006/proceedings/2006-03-16-Frontiers2006-Paredis.pdf#search=%22Set-Based%20Design%3AA%20Decision-Theoretic%20Perspective%22Paredis.pdf#search=%22Set-Based%20Design%3AA%20Decision-Theoretic%20Perspective%22 (accessed on 02 Oct 2006)
  • Rekuc, S.J., J.M. Aughenbaugh, M. Bruns, and C.J.J. Paredis, 2006, Eliminating Design Alternatives Based on Imprecise Information, Society of Automotive Engineering World Congress, paper no. 2006-01-0272, April 3-6, 2006, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Saaty T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw Hill, NY, 1980
  • Senge P.M., The Fifth Discipline, Random House, UK, 1990
  • Sobek D.K. et al., Toyota’s principles of set-based concurrent engineering, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 40, winter 1999.
  • Wu S., A Probabilistic Model of Set-Based Design, MIT Undergraduate Journal of Mathematics
  • http://www.aitriz.org/ (The Altshuller Institute for TRIZ studies, website)
  • http://www.triz-journal.com/
  • http://www.dsmweb.org/
  • Kurzweil R. (2005) The singularity is near – when humans transcend biology. Penguin, USA.
  • Simon H. A., (1996) The sciences of the artificial. 3rd edition, The MIT Press, USA.
  • Chesbrough H., (2006) Open innovation – the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business School Press, USA.
  • Brafman O. and Beckstorm R.A., (2006) The starfish and the spider – The unstoppable power of leaderless organizations, Penguin, USA.
  • Sanders T., (2002) Love is the killer app – How to win business and influence friends, Crown Business, NY.
  • Handy C., (1990) The age of unreason, Harvard Business School Press, USA.
  • Gladwell M., (2000) The tipping point – How little things can make a big difference, Little, Brown and Co., Great Britain.
  • Hagel J III. and Singer M, (1999) Net worth – Shaping markets when customers make the rules, Harvard Business School Press, USA.
  • Morita A., Reingold E.M., Shimomura M., (1994) Made in Japan, Harper Collins, London.
  • Polya G., (2004) How to solve it – a new aspect of mathematical method, Princeton Science library edition.
  • Perkins D., (2000) Archimedes’ Bathtub – The art and logic of breakthrough thinking, W.W. Norton and company, NY.
  • Treacy M and Wiersema F, (1993 Jan-Feb) Customer Intimacy and Other Value Disciplines – Three paths to market leadership, Harvard Business Review.
  • Taleb N. N., (2007) Fooled by Randomness – the hidden role of chance in life and in the markets, Second Edition, Penguin, US.
  • O’Reilly C.A. and Tushman M.L., (2004 April), The Ambidextrous Organization, Harvard Business Review.
Post a Comment

My Book @Goodread

My GoodReads